BiblePlaces describes modern names as a bridge to the regions and cities readers meet in the text, and several cities in Israel named in the Bible still have recognizable names today: Jerusalem, Bethlehem, Hebron, Jericho, Jaffa, Beersheba, Ashdod, Ashkelon, Acre, and Lod are useful places to begin. The list needs one caution. A surviving name is a clue, not a shortcut around history, language, archaeology, or the changing shape of a city.

A biblical place name is not always a pin on a modern map

Lists of biblical places can look more definite than they are. A place may appear under more than one name. That is a useful warning. Some names identify a city, some a district, some a kingdom, some a valley, and some a landmark. A modern place can preserve the sound of an ancient name without preserving the same streets, walls, borders, or population.

That does not make the names useless. It makes them worth reading closely. A bridge is the right image. It helps a reader cross into the landscape without pretending that the journey is finished.

Ancient stone tower ruins south of Beit Dhikrin
Ancient stone remains in the hill country, a reminder that names and ruins do not always preserve a simple one-to-one story.

Familiar names that still appear on maps

Jerusalem is the clearest starting point. It is named repeatedly in the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament, and its name remains immediately recognizable. 2 Samuel 5:6-10 places David’s capture of the city at a decisive moment in Israel’s story. The modern city is far larger than the ancient city, but the name gives readers a genuine point of continuity.

Bethlehem also remains familiar. Ruth’s story begins in Bethlehem of Judah, and the Gospels connect it to the birth of Jesus. Those passages show why the place carries more than one layer of memory for Jewish and Christian readers.

Hebron is associated with Abraham, Sarah, David, and the patriarchal narratives. It appears in Genesis 23 and 2 Samuel 2. In a list like this, Hebron matters because it keeps a familiar name while carrying a long and contested history that cannot be reduced to one biblical episode.

Jericho is another unmistakable name. The story in Joshua 6 is the reason many readers first remember it. The biblical story and the archaeological landscape must be read on their own terms, but the name still gives a reader a recognizable doorway into the Jordan Valley.

Ruins of Samaria in a hilly landscape
Ruins at Samaria, photographed as an archaeological landscape rather than a reconstruction of a biblical scene.

Names that changed slightly, rather than disappeared

Joppa is commonly encountered today as Jaffa. The port appears in the story of Jonah and in Acts, where Peter stays with Simon the tanner. The biblical references place it on the coast and make the shift from Joppa to Jaffa easier to recognize without making the two words a linguistic puzzle.

Beersheba appears as Beer-sheba or Beersheba in English Bibles. Abraham’s covenant story in Genesis 21 gives the place a name and an argument over a well. The English spelling varies, but the name has not vanished from the landscape.

Acco may be more familiar under the modern form Acre. It appears in Judges 1:31 among places associated with the territory of Asher. The difference in spelling is exactly the sort of change readers should expect when a name moves through Hebrew, Greek, Latin, Arabic, English, and modern maps.

Lod is named in the New Testament account of Aeneas in Acts 9:32-35. Here the continuity is simple enough to notice, but the text still tells the reader more than a map can. It places a healing in a town and a community, not in a mere label.

Stone-paved Roman street at Sepphoris
Stone paving at Sepphoris, an archaeological site in Galilee.

Coastal cities in the biblical story

Ashdod and Ashkelon belong to the coastal plain and appear in accounts involving the Philistines. 1 Samuel 5 names Ashdod in the story of the ark, while Judges 1:18 names Ashkelon. Their modern names are recognizable, but the ancient political world around them is not a modern nation-state in miniature.

Gaza also appears in biblical texts, but it is a good example of why a list should stay careful. The name is ancient, yet the historical, political, and human realities attached to it have changed again and again. A reader can acknowledge the continuity of the name without using a biblical reference as a shortcut through a present-day conflict.

Why the distinction matters when reading the Bible

A map can steady a reader. It can also tempt a reader to flatten the text. The Bible’s places are often bound to a journey, a covenant, a battle, a lament, a trade route, or a home. A name is not the meaning of a passage. It is part of the setting that makes the passage concrete.

That is why a good list separates three questions: what name does the text use, what place is usually associated with that name, and what is actually known about the historical site. The answers may line up neatly. They may not. Readers lose nothing by admitting the difference. They gain a better sense of what the text asks them to notice.

Place names can become a way of avoiding the harder question

There is a temptation to make biblical geography feel like possession. If the name can be matched, perhaps the meaning can be controlled. Israel presses against that impulse. It asks what happens when people turn the things meant to point beyond themselves into objects of confidence, proof, or religious leverage.

Readers who want that argument in full can begin with the argument behind the book. The names in this list matter, but they do not carry the final weight. The biblical story keeps asking what people will do when history, land, promise, failure, and grace refuse to stay as manageable as a list.

Frequently asked questions

Which Bible city names are still used in Israel?

Jerusalem, Bethlehem, Hebron, Jericho, Jaffa, Beersheba, Ashdod, Ashkelon, Acre, and Lod are among the names readers may still encounter. The spelling, boundaries, and historical continuity of each place still need to be considered one by one.

Are modern Israeli cities exactly the same as biblical cities?

Not always. A modern city may preserve an ancient name while sitting beside, above, or beyond an archaeological site. Some biblical places have more than one proposed identification, and some names describe a region rather than a single settlement.

Why do biblical places have several names?

The Bible was written across long periods and several languages. Transliteration, translation, conquest, migration, and later mapmaking can all give one place more than one form of its name.

Images: Sarah Murray, Oren Rozen, PikiWiki Israel, and Yael Gluskin via Wikimedia Commons. The photographs are used under their listed licenses.